| This study analyses Indonesia’s
experience with its Reforestation Fund, and examines implications for
REDD+. The Reforestation Fund (Dana Reboisasi, DR) is a national forest
fund financed by a volume-based timber levy to support reforestation
and forest rehabilitation. Since 1989, the fund has had receipts of US
$5.8 billion. During the Soeharto era, the Ministry of Forestry
allocated more than US $1.0 billion in cash grants and loans from the
Reforestation Fund to promote commercial plantation development. Many
recipients fraudulently marked up their costs and overstated areas
planted, causing the programme to fall well short of targets. The
Ministry also disbursed US $600 million to finance politically favoured
projects outside the Fund’s mandate of promoting reforestation and
forest rehabilitation. A 1999 external audit by Ernst & Young
documented billions of dollars in losses, citing systematic financial
mismanagement. Since 1998, successive post-Soeharto governments have
taken steps to improve financial governance by: transferring authority
over the Reforestation Fund to the Ministry of Finance; strengthening
the Supreme Audit Board’s authority to monitor public financial assets;
and creating a Corruption Eradication Commission which has prosecuted
dozens of senior officials. However, continuing problems with the
Reforestation Fund hold significant implications for future REDD+
payment schemes. The study highlights how national strategies to manage
both the Reforestation Fund and REDD+ funding streams must: strengthen
financial management and revenue administration; deal with corruption,
fraud, and loss of state assets; monitor, report, and verify financial
transactions; remove misaligned and perverse incentives; ensure
accountability and mitigating moral hazard; and distribute benefits
equitably. Author | : | Barr, C.; Dermawan, A.; Purnomo, H.; Komarudin, H. |
Publisher | : | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. |
Publication Year | : | 2010 |
Source: CIFOR
Tags: CIFOR , Occasional Paper , REDD+ , Reforestation Fund , Soeharto
Attachments:
| File | Description | File size |
a political economic analysis of lessons for REDD+ | Financial governance and Indonesia’s Reforestation Fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989–2009: a political economic analysis of lessons for REDD+ | 739 Kb |
|
| Last Updated ( Thursday, 14 January 2010 13:32 ) |
|
|
| This paper presents the results
of a preliminary survey of emerging demonstration and readiness
activities to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation and carbon stock enhancement (REDD+) across Africa, Asia,
and Latin America. The survey was conducted between November and
December 2008, and the information collected was updated until May
2009. While the results of the survey offer a useful snapshot of the
landscape of REDD+ activities, they do not capture all the dynamics
associated with this rapidly evolving field. As the international
debate on REDD+ continues, some projects surveyed may have changed
their core objectives and activities, while others may never get off
the ground. Another limitation of the survey is the ongoing lack of any
clear definition of what constitutes a REDD+ demonstration activity.
Despite these shortcomings, this survey offers insights on current
trends to inform future REDD+ investments. In total the survey found
over 100 REDD+ activities: 44 demonstration activities, 65 readiness
activities (including those by the Forest Carbon Partnerhship Facility
and the UN-REDD Programme) and 12 activities where carbon is not an
explicit goal. Indonesia has by far the most demonstration activities
in the pipeline, making Asia the region with the largest number of
REDD+ activities. Many projects (68%) are still in the planning stage.
A preliminary assessment of incipient REDD+ investments shows the
following. First, REDD+ initiatives, especially demonstration
activities, tend to target countries where deforestation or the risk of
deforestation is significant, which suggests realised carbon
effectiveness considerations. Second, poor governance contexts do not
discourage REDD+ investments, although cost-efficiency considerations
may suggest otherwise. Third, although there is scope for natural
equity and co-benefits, there is also a risk of trade-offs between
carbon effectiveness and cobenefits. Dry forests – where many rural
poor live and where there are high levels of biodiversity – tend to be
carbon poor and, thus, feature far less in REDD+ demonstration
activities than humid forests. Balancing trade-offs between
cost-effectiveness and co-benefit considerations will likely become a
central challenge for REDD+ policies and activities. Spatially
explicit, high-resolution, environmental and socioeconomic data can
offer new scope for REDD+ investments to enhance carbon goals while
securing REDD+ co-benefits. Policy makers, donors, and other investors
in REDD+ and/or REDD+ co-benefits could assemble such data to enhance
their investment choices, monitor their outcomes, and thus provide
valuable lessons to inform the national and global REDD+ architecture.
Although performance-based payments analogous to payments for
environmental services (PES) are core features of the REDD+ idea, the
survey further shows that REDD+ policies will require more than
PES-type REDD+ schemes. Investments in improved governance and broader
policy reforms are equally important to address the root causes of
forest emissions. Finding the right policy mix in different country
contexts is an important challenge ahead. Author | : | Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Kongphan-apirak, M. |
Publisher | : | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. |
Publication Year | : | 2009 |
Source: CIFOR
Tags: carbon , environmental , UN-REDD
Attachments:
| File | Description | File size |
REDD preliminary survey | Emerging REDD+: a preliminary survey of demonstration and readiness activities | 978 Kb |
|
| Last Updated ( Friday, 11 December 2009 18:13 ) |
|
| The state of REDD negotiations
|
| Friday, 11 December 2009 17:55 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| The state of REDD negotiations: consensus points, options for moving forward and research needs to support the process
The United Nations
Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD) commissioned this
report from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) to
summarize the current state of negotiations towards a decision in
Copenhagen, specifically outlining areas of consensus, options for
resolving areas where consensus has not yet been reached, and
priorities for research to support successful implementation of an
international REDD Programme following a decision at the 15th
Conference of the Parties (COP) in Copenhagen. Author | : | Verchot, L.V.; Petkova, E. |
Publisher | : | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. |
Publication Year | : | 2009 |
Source: CIFOR
Tags: CIFOR , consensus points , negotiations , UN-REDD
Attachments:
| File | Description | File size |
REDD negotiations | The state of REDD negotiations: consensus points, options for moving forward and research needs to support the process by CIFOR | 712 Kb |
|
| Last Updated ( Friday, 11 December 2009 18:06 ) |
|
| Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+) started as a global initiative. Much of the initial debate has focussed on the global REDD+ architecture and how REDD+ can be included in a post-2012 climate agreement. But the debates and the focus of actions have now increasingly moved to national and local levels. More than 40 countries are developing national REDD+ strategies and policies, and hundreds of REDD+ projects have been initiated across the tropics. This book wants to inform these national and local processes, by asking some basic questions: How are participating countries going to reduce emissions and increase carbon stocks that they hope to be paid for through global mechanisms? What new institutions, processes, policies, and projects are needed? What are the options in these areas, and how do they compare? Author | : | Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Kanninen, M.; Sills, E.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.; Abdel Nour, H.O.; (eds.). |
Publisher | : | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia. |
Publication Year | : | 2009 |
Klik here to download (4 MB)
Source: CIFOR
Tags: climate change , REDD+ |
| Last Updated ( Friday, 11 December 2009 17:54 ) |
|
| The Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the
Convention (AWG-LCA), at its first session, invited Parties and
accredited observer organizations to provide additional information,
views and proposals on paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan (decision 1/CP.13),
as may be required for each session. It requested the secretariat to
post these submissions on the UNFCCC website. The AWG-LCA, at its
second session, further requested the secretariat to compile such
submissions from Parties and intergovernmental organizations into
separate miscellaneous documents, and make them available one week
prior to the respective sessions for consideration by the AWG-LCA. The
secretariat received six such submissions from six intergovernmental
organizations between 15 June 2009 and 17 September 2009. In accordance
with the procedure for miscellaneous documents, these submissions are
contained in this document and reproduced in the language in which they
were received and without formal editing. Source: unfccc.int
Tags: AWG-LCA , Bali Action Plan , document
Attachments:
| File | Description | File size |
AWG-LCA Bali Action Plan | Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan .Submissions from intergovernmental organizations | 1105 Kb |
|
| Last Updated ( Friday, 02 October 2009 11:09 ) |
|
|
|